| |
Now that grocery workers have fired two warning shots, negotiators
must get serious about a deal.
UNIONIZED GROCERY workers in Southern California brought more drama
to their contract negotiations this week, voting overwhelmingly to
authorize a strike if contract talks break down. The move reflected
the Kabuki-theater quality of major contract negotiations, whose
slow pace often prompts union members to pose belligerently simply
to energize the proceedings. In this case, however, the vote
reminded negotiators for Ralphs, Vons and Albertsons that these
episodes don't always end well. It suggested that only four years
after a wrenching 141-day strike and lockout, union members are
willing to stage another walkout in pursuit of a better deal.
If they do, recent history tells us, both sides would be the losers.
The last go-round cost the companies an estimated $1.5 billion and
either drove workers out of the industry or drained their savings.
Paradoxically, the United Food and Commercial Workers' strong
support for authorizing a strike — more than 95% of the members
voted in favor, according to the union — may help avert an impasse
by giving the companies a better feel for the workers' sentiments.
At issue are contracts covering 65,000 workers in stores from
Bakersfield to the state's southern border. The three chains'
agreements with the seven UFCW locals expired March 5, leaving the
companies running on the fumes of temporary extensions. Although
negotiators have agreed on several important points, such as
reducing the amount of time new workers must wait to receive health
benefits, other disputes remain.
The companies' insistence on addressing one issue at a time has
frustrated union negotiators, who are eager to undo the two-tiered
wage system created after the last bitter fight. More than half of
the union's members in Southern California are in the lower tier, in
which health benefits are delayed and wages reduced. The companies
say they're willing to shorten the time workers spend in the
lower-paying tier, but they're obviously in less of a hurry to sign
a deal to that effect. They've withheld putting a complete offer on
the table, saying they need more time to work through the issues
around healthcare, wages and pensions.
The latest vote was the second attempt by the union to add urgency
to the talks. Albertsons' workers voted in late March to authorize a
strike; by early June, negotiators for the two sides were trumpeting
a tentative agreement on health benefits. Talks quickly stalled
again, however, leading workers at Ralphs and Vons to vote Sunday to
approve a strike. The two sides broke off negotiations last week but
are expected to resume discussions this week. Here's hoping that the
union's second warning shot will prompt both sides to stay at the
table until the deals are done.
|
|